U.S. Extradition Complaint Against Emory Andrew Tate for UK Sexual Offense Charges

A U.S. federal complaint seeks the provisional arrest of Emory Andrew Tate for extradition to the UK, where he faces charges of rape and assault. The document outlines the treaty basis and allegations from two accusers.

1unique views
2downloads
22pages
1.3 MBoriginal PDF
Document viewergov.uscourts.flsd.719191.3.0_1.pdf

If the PDF does not display in your browser, download the original file.

Read with context. Charges and allegations do not establish guilt. A defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court, and later filings may update this record.

About this document

A plain-language guide to the contents and context of this specific public document.

Extradition Treaty Basis

The complaint cites a 2003 extradition treaty between the U.S. and UK, as amended in 2004, which allows for provisional arrest before a formal extradition request. The UK seeks Tate's arrest under Article 12 of this treaty while preparing supporting documents. The U.S. government states it is fulfilling its treaty obligations by pursuing this action.

Supported by PDF pages 2, 3

UK Criminal Charges

UK authorities accuse Tate of violating Section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (rape) and Section 47 of the Offenses Against the Person Act 1861 (assault causing bodily harm). A Westminster Magistrates Court judge issued an arrest warrant on January 19, 2024. The complaint notes the UK may add charges later but currently proceeds only on these two offenses.

Supported by PDF pages 3, 4

Allegations from First Accuser

The complaint describes allegations from a woman identified as Complainant A, who says Tate choked her unconscious during nonconsensual intercourse in England in early 2015. She claims Tate repeatedly restricted her breathing during the encounter and provided UK investigators with social media messages allegedly exchanged with Tate's verified @CobraTate account. Authorities note this account remains active, with Tate recently posting from Washington, D.C.

Supported by PDF pages 4, 5

Allegations from Second Accuser

A separate accuser, Complainant B, alleges nonconsensual choking during sexual encounters with Tate in 2014 and 2025. She reported one incident left visible neck marks and said she feared for her life. While acknowledging some prior consensual relations, she stated she did not consent to the violent acts described. Both women identified Tate through his media appearances and social media presence.

Supported by PDF pages 5, 6

Procedural Requests

Prosecutors ask the court to issue an arrest warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 3184 and seal the complaint until execution, citing flight risk concerns. They note Tate was seen in Miami before a scheduled boxing event appearance. The document states the UK will submit formal extradition paperwork within treaty time limits and that provisional arrest is urgent to prevent Tate from leaving the U.S.

Supported by PDF pages 1, 6

Treaty Provisions Cited

The annex includes the full US-UK extradition treaty text, showing extraditable offenses require potential 1+ year imprisonment in both countries. It specifies that political/military offenses are excluded but lists violent crimes like rape as qualifying. The treaty allows 60-day provisional detention before requiring formal extradition documents.

Supported by PDF pages 12, 13, 18
01

Document record

Document type
Criminal complaint
Category
Criminal
Publication date
2026-07-18
Court or office
Not stated by source
Case number
1:26-mj-03260
Collected
2026-11-13
Original filename
gov.uscourts.flsd.719191.3.0_1.pdf
02

Source & integrity

This copy is preserved from the linked source record. The fingerprint below lets you verify that the bytes have not changed.

SHA-25639f541713cb42759aea17a460a1e25c462231aac0c4e5c7064e3b5bbec8c8d37
Open source PDF Open source context page

ShareIt.onl is an independent public-document index and is not affiliated with CourtListener or any court. Documents are published here only after source and file-integrity review. Always use the linked source record for authoritative context and later updates.