U.S. Memorandum Supporting Extradition of Emory Andrew Tate to the UK
The U.S. Department of Justice filed a memorandum supporting the extradition of Emory Andrew Tate, a dual U.S.-UK citizen, to the United Kingdom. The UK seeks Tate’s prosecution for 39 offenses, including human trafficking, rape, and possession of indecent images, allegedly committed between 2011 and 2017.
Read with context. This preserved document reflects its source and publication date. Check the linked source context page for corrections, replacements, or later developments.
If the PDF does not display in your browser, download the original file.
About this document
A plain-language guide to the contents and context of this specific court or DOJ document.
Background of the Extradition Request
The United Kingdom requested the extradition of Emory Andrew Tate to prosecute him for 42 offenses, 39 of which are relevant to the U.S. proceeding. These charges include human trafficking, rape, assault, controlling prostitution, and possession of indecent images. The alleged crimes occurred in the UK between 2011 and 2017. An extradition hearing is scheduled for November 19, 2026, in the Southern District of Florida.
Supported by PDF pages 1, 2Allegations Against Emory Andrew Tate
The UK alleges that Tate, along with his brother Tristan Tate, operated a webcam business that exploited women through coercion and violence. Tate is accused of recruiting women, often through deceptive romantic relationships, and forcing them into commercial sexual exploitation. The UK also alleges Tate produced and distributed indecent images of a minor and possessed extreme pornographic material.
Supported by PDF pages 3, 4Evidence Presented by the UK
The UK provided detailed evidence, including victim testimonies, travel records, and communications between Tate and the alleged victims. Victims described being coerced into performing sexual acts online, subjected to physical violence, and having their passports confiscated. The UK also submitted forensic evidence from devices seized from Tate, which allegedly contained indecent images of a minor.
Supported by PDF pages 5, 6Legal Basis for Extradition
The U.S. argues that the UK’s request meets the requirements of the extradition treaty between the two countries. The treaty allows extradition for offenses punishable by at least one year of imprisonment. The U.S. contends that the alleged crimes are dually criminal, meaning they would also be offenses under U.S. law. The U.S. also asserts that the UK has provided sufficient evidence to establish probable cause for each charge.
Supported by PDF pages 7, 8Role of the Court in Extradition
The U.S. memorandum explains that the court’s role in the extradition hearing is limited to determining whether the UK has presented sufficient evidence to sustain the charges under the treaty. The court does not assess guilt or innocence but evaluates whether probable cause exists. If the court finds sufficient evidence, it will certify the matter to the Secretary of State, who will decide whether to surrender Tate to the UK.
Supported by PDF pages 9, 10Next Steps in the Extradition Process
If the court certifies the extradition request, Tate will remain in custody pending the Secretary of State’s decision. The Secretary has broad discretion to consider factors such as humanitarian concerns and foreign relations. The U.S. memorandum concludes by requesting the court to certify Tate’s extradition to the UK.
Supported by PDF pages 11, 12Document record
- Document type
- Other DOJ document
- Category
- Other
- Publication date
- 2026-10-26
- DOJ office
- Not stated by source
- Case number
- 1:26-mj-03260
- Collected
- 2026-11-13
- Original filename
- gov.uscourts.flsd.719191.74.0_1.pdf
Source & integrity
This copy is preserved from the linked source record. The fingerprint below lets you verify that the bytes have not changed.
54e03b8a9e1efb2ce6443b604267b317fc5d8efe4e9f84b8050a8c3ca1c25ca1ShareIt.onl is an independent public-document index and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice or CourtListener. The linked source record remains authoritative.